Hi Piotr > Am 06.02.2025 um 16:16 schrieb Piotr P. Karwasz <pi...@mailing.copernik.eu>: > > Hi Thomas, > > On 6.02.2025 10:47, Thomas Vandahl wrote: >> One main design principle of JCS always was to have as few external >> dependencies as possible. In fact, JCS 3.0 core only depends on JDK. >> Therefore, JUL was chosen as a logging framework. Log4j2 is an option. You >> may easily roll your own logging system, such as SLF4j. The wrapper was >> created to provide this versatility. > > I know that not having dependencies is a very attractive characteristic, but > how does that work in practice?
It used to work, yes. > On the other hand I see that JCS has a dozen log statements in total. Maybe > using JUL directly should be enough? This could be replaced with > `System.Logger` once Java 9 is selected as baseline. Where did you get „a dozen" from? I count about 800 log-calls in the code. If switched to debug, JCS can be pretty chatty. I like the System.Logger approach, however. JCS 4.0 will be Java 17 anyway, so let’s make that happen. Bye, Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
