On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:57:47 -0400 Joel Savitz wrote:
> Currently, there is no fast mechanism to get the virtual memory size of
> the current process from userspace. This information is available to the
> user through several means, one being a linear search of the entire address
> space. This is
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 04:57:47PM -0400, Joel Savitz wrote:
> Currently, there is no fast mechanism to get the virtual memory size of
> the current process from userspace.
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,10 @@ void task_mem(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 04:57:47PM -0400, Joel Savitz wrote:
> Currently, there is no fast mechanism to get the virtual memory size of
> the current process from userspace. This information is available to the
> user through several means, one being a linear search of the entire address
> space. Th
Currently, there is no fast mechanism to get the virtual memory size of
the current process from userspace. This information is available to the
user through several means, one being a linear search of the entire address
space. This is the method used by a component of the libhugetlb kernel
test, a
4 matches
Mail list logo